Skip to article frontmatterSkip to article content
Site not loading correctly?

This may be due to an incorrect BASE_URL configuration. See the MyST Documentation for reference.

ii. Peptide Filtering and Similarity Screening

ii. Peptide Filtering and Similarity Screening

The large peptide pool generated from slicing was filtered to identify biologically relevant molecular mimicry candidates. The filtering strategy focused on three key criteria:

HLA-B27 Binding Prediction

All generated peptides from both human and microbial sources were screened for HLA-B27 binding using NetMHCpan Reynisson et al. (2020),.

Based on predicted binding affinity, peptides were classified as:

Only top strong binders were retained for further analysis based on binding scores. Approximately ten strong-binding ANX peptides and ninety strong-binding microbial peptides were selected at this stage.

Mimicry Scoring

Sequence similarity between human ANX peptides and microbial peptides was evaluated using a two-step approach.

First, BLAST-based Altschul et al. (1990), sequence comparison was used for an initial inspection of similarity between human and microbial peptides. This step provided a broad overview of potential overlaps and helped guide further analysis.

Subsequently, pairwise sequence alignment was performed using Biopython (Bio.Align) Cock et al. (2009), with the BLOSUM62 scoring matrix Henikoff & Henikoff (1992),. This step was used for systematic and quantitative similarity scoring between ANX-derived peptides and Klebsiella pneumoniae peptides.

The pairwise alignment scores were used to identify microbial peptides sharing conserved residues and sequence patterns with the human reference peptide, and these candidates were carried forward for binding prediction and structural analysis.

Selection of Top Mimicry Candidates

To prioritize candidates for structural modeling, all 28 peptides (3 anx and 25 kp) obtained from previous scoring were ranked based on a combination of:

For each 3 ANX peptide, the top 5 microbial mimicry candidates were extracted by using python script and they were further used for docking and molecular dynamics simulations processes.

References
  1. Reynisson, B., Alvarez, B., Paul, S., Peters, B., & Nielsen, M. (2020). NetMHCpan-4.1 and NetMHCIIpan-4.0: improved predictions of MHC antigen presentation by concurrent motif deconvolution and integration of MS MHC eluted ligand data. Nucleic Acids Research, 48(W1), W449–W454. 10.1093/nar/gkaa379
  2. Altschul, S. F., Gish, W., Miller, W., Myers, E. W., & Lipman, D. J. (1990). Basic local alignment search tool. Journal of Molecular Biology, 215(3), 403–410. 10.1016/S0022-2836(05)80360-2
  3. Cock, P. J. A., Antao, T., Chang, J. T., & others. (2009). Biopython: freely available Python tools for computational molecular biology and bioinformatics. Bioinformatics, 25(11), 1422–1423. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp163
  4. Henikoff, S., & Henikoff, J. G. (1992). Amino acid substitution matrices from protein blocks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 89(22), 10915–10919. 10.1073/pnas.89.22.10915